|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
12-21-2007, 07:52 PM
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: phoenix and moultonboro
Posts: 1,560
Thanks: 61
Thanked 276 Times in 194 Posts
|
Hb 925 sounds like something that Chavez would approve. How does it make sense to tax non residencial property at twice when most don't even use resources equal to residents. One can justify paying fair share based on value or the property but twice makes no sense .
__________________
it's tough to make predictions specially about the future |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
