![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,546
Thanks: 222
Thanked 830 Times in 501 Posts
|
![]()
Let's look at this a different way... The proponents are complaining that the lake is overcrowded and dangerous now. Any issues with this so far?
Now, what will happen when the big scary go fast boats leave (being that is the thought process behind them)? Their thoughts are that lots of families will come back who have been previously driven out They will be bringing their boats, jet skiis and bad boating skills to an already overcrowded lake. What will now happen is even more crowding, higher likelihood of accidents because of the crowding and sheer volume of boats, more pollution from the added people, boat traffic, swimmers, etc.. Are you really going to be happy with the outcome of this all should it pass? What is your next argument? Ban them all I bet...I hope your attempt at revenge is worth it, you may be the one bitten in the end. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
This state has some wacky rules...like I have seven: kayaks, canoe, rowboat,& sailboats and don't pay a dime for registration. Win $850,000 in the Powerball and the state makes a great big zero. Purchase a pizzarama pizza that needs to be baked at home in the oven at 350 degrees for 20 minutes and still I pay 8% or 40 cents tax for the pizza. So, my pizzarama pizza is paying for the state services used by the Powerball winner (who shall remain nameless because he is a reverred state leader).
![]()
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,254
Thanks: 423
Thanked 366 Times in 175 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,254
Thanks: 423
Thanked 366 Times in 175 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|