Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-15-2009, 05:35 AM   #1
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 6,028
Thanks: 2,285
Thanked 789 Times in 564 Posts
Arrow Practical Measuring Method Needed

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodsy View Post
"...I. No person shall operate a motorcycle which has a measured noise level of more than [106] 95 decibels..."
Note the change from 106 to 95 decibels: The quieter requirement is demanded by many automobile race tracks in Europe and the US.

Quote:
Originally Posted by brk-lnt View Post
Would be funny to calibrate your law-required tachometer to read 2800RPMS when you're at 1000. In fact, it's the sort of thing that would be very easy to enable/disable with the flip of a hidden switch...
LEOs couldn't miss the difference between 2800-RPMs and an idle of 1000-RPMs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WeirsBeachBoater View Post
"...Noise is Noise, but to ban any and all aftermarket exhaust is too far..."
I agree that banning aftermarket exhaust isn't right, but the new tachometer requirement is begged by unwieldy demands on law enforcement within the old law.

Regardless of the State of one's residency, measuring motorcycle noise needs to have some practical measure: I suggest the presence of ripples on the surface of a cup of coffee supported on the ground by a doughnut at 25 feet.

The old law requires complexities reminiscent of a Romulan plot—hence these unworkable changes in the new proposal.
__________________
Is it
"Common Sense" isn't.
ApS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 09:25 AM   #2
Woodsy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 1,974
Thanks: 80
Thanked 984 Times in 443 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Acres per Second View Post
LEOs couldn't miss the difference between 2800-RPMs and an idle of 1000-RPMs.
APS...

That proves my point.... Lets say the LEO is suspicious of the bikes tach reading. The bike just doesnt sound like 2800 RPM.

The problem is he cannot definitively say exactly what RPM the motor was spinning at the time of the test. He can only state that it was his opinion the motor wasnt spinning at the proper RPM. This invalidates the test, and wastes the time of the LEO and the courts should the LEO decide to write the ticket anyway!

Noise tests do not need to be made into a big production...... or require gyrations from the LEO's...

You need a calibrated Inductive Tachometer, a calibrated dB meter, and a tape measure!

1. Attach tach to spark plug wire, adjust tach for appropriate number of cylinders. (Note: this can be any spark plug wire. It doesnt have to be #1 cylinder) Spark plug wires are easily accessable on most V-Twin motorcycles.

2. Measure appropriate distance & angle off motorcycle. Place dB meter at appropriate spot.

3. Take a reading of the ambient noise level as noted by dB meter. This may be important for court.

4. Rev engine to 2800 as indicated by calibrated tachometer

5. Note dB meter reading and issue the pass/fail.

It doesnt have to be that hard or expensive.... I swear the politicians could screw up replacing a lightbulb!

Requiring morotcycles to have a tach or completely stock exhaust is just assinine!!

Woodsy
__________________
The only way to eliminate ignorant behavior is through education. You can't fix stupid.
Woodsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 10:10 AM   #3
Woodsy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 1,974
Thanks: 80
Thanked 984 Times in 443 Posts
Default

I wont even get into the fact that this law ONLY targets the V-twin (Harley) crowd!

Woodsy
__________________
The only way to eliminate ignorant behavior is through education. You can't fix stupid.
Woodsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 03:23 PM   #4
brk-lnt
Senior Member
 
brk-lnt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South Down Shores
Posts: 1,947
Thanks: 545
Thanked 570 Times in 335 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodsy View Post
I wont even get into the fact that this law ONLY targets the V-twin (Harley) crowd!

Woodsy
Not being totally bike-savvy myself, how do you come to this conclusion? It seems like the law applies to bikes in general, not just the Harley crowd, but perhaps I missed something key.
__________________
[insert witty phrase here]
brk-lnt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 03:28 PM   #5
Woodsy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 1,974
Thanks: 80
Thanked 984 Times in 443 Posts
Default

Brk...

At 2800 RPM the V-twin motor is right in the middle of its powerband.... I dont think there are many Harleys that rev over 5000 RPM. They are tractor motors after all...

Your run of the mill 4 cyl crotch rocket doesnt get to its powerband until 7000 - 8000 RPM. They can rev as high as 13,000 RPM! A piped crotch rocket would be very quiet @ 2800 RPM.

Woodsy
__________________
The only way to eliminate ignorant behavior is through education. You can't fix stupid.
Woodsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 01-15-2009, 06:31 PM   #6
brk-lnt
Senior Member
 
brk-lnt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South Down Shores
Posts: 1,947
Thanks: 545
Thanked 570 Times in 335 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodsy View Post
Brk...

At 2800 RPM the V-twin motor is right in the middle of its powerband.... I dont think there are many Harleys that rev over 5000 RPM. They are tractor motors after all...

Your run of the mill 4 cyl crotch rocket doesnt get to its powerband until 7000 - 8000 RPM. They can rev as high as 13,000 RPM! A piped crotch rocket would be very quiet @ 2800 RPM.

Woodsy
Very interesting, makes sense now that you spelled it out.

I'm (obviously) not a rider, but it's been on my to-do list for several years

I do have this un-biased comment, though, the "loud pipes" crowd is pretty fugging annoying the majority of the time. The "loud pipes save lives" argument would only seem to apply to anything approaching directly from behind, for the most part it really comes off as a cross between a "look and me" and an "F U" statement.

Although I've never kept valid statistics, I can't recall the last time I heard a crotch rocket with an insanely loud exhaust.

Hard to say if this is the result of a specific anti-V Twin beef, or an attempt to just target the law towards the most common offenders. (I realize it may be hard to distinguish between the two statements.
__________________
[insert witty phrase here]
brk-lnt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 08:25 PM   #7
VitaBene
Senior Member
 
VitaBene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 3,644
Thanks: 1,718
Thanked 1,662 Times in 861 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brk-lnt View Post
Very interesting, makes sense now that you spelled it out.

I'm (obviously) not a rider, but it's been on my to-do list for several years

I do have this un-biased comment, though, the "loud pipes" crowd is pretty fugging annoying the majority of the time. The "loud pipes save lives" argument would only seem to apply to anything approaching directly from behind, for the most part it really comes off as a cross between a "look and me" and an "F U" statement.

Although I've never kept valid statistics, I can't recall the last time I heard a crotch rocket with an insanely loud exhaust.

Hard to say if this is the result of a specific anti-V Twin beef, or an attempt to just target the law towards the most common offenders. (I realize it may be hard to distinguish between the two statements.

I agree with BRK on this- there are few things more annoying than a straight piped V-Twin (let's be realistic most of them are HDs). I don't think it is anti-HD sentiment, people just don't want to get blown off the porch when a bike goes by (and yes I have riding a HD since well before it was fashionable to do so).

Woodsy is right on with the equipment- I don't have a tach, never did, never will- the LEO should supply that.
VitaBene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 08:32 PM   #8
Cobalt 25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 230
Thanks: 231
Thanked 36 Times in 20 Posts
Default loud pipes are obnoxious

To me, loud pipes are the number one reason for people to dislike motorcycles. I had straight pipes when I was 21 years old and have since grown up. I wish riders with loud pipes would figure out a different way to be noticed, because that seems to be ultimate in self-centeredness.

I'm a life member of the American Motorcycle Association and have watched this debate for many years. The personal freedom argument pales in comparison to the obnoxious assault on one's senses that these bikes produce, IMO.

This new law may have some aspects that will be difficult to enforce, but each state needs to address this issue. Aftermarket exhaust systems are fine as long as they can comply with the appropriate db levels.

Wouldn't it be nice if we in the motorcycling community could influence all riders to be reasonable about noise levels, then we wouldn't need these laws.

Peter
Cobalt 25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 08:40 PM   #9
VitaBene
Senior Member
 
VitaBene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 3,644
Thanks: 1,718
Thanked 1,662 Times in 861 Posts
Default

Maybe it is because I am an old fart, but I don't like thru-hull open exhausts on boats either. It is no different than straight pipes on bikes- ew ew ew Mr Cotter pick (look at) me!
VitaBene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 10:21 PM   #10
secondcurve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,129
Thanks: 1,358
Thanked 564 Times in 291 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobalt 25 View Post
To me, loud pipes are the number one reason for people to dislike motorcycles. I had straight pipes when I was 21 years old and have since grown up. I wish riders with loud pipes would figure out a different way to be noticed, because that seems to be ultimate in self-centeredness.

I'm a life member of the American Motorcycle Association and have watched this debate for many years. The personal freedom argument pales in comparison to the obnoxious assault on one's senses that these bikes produce, IMO.

This new law may have some aspects that will be difficult to enforce, but each state needs to address this issue. Aftermarket exhaust systems are fine as long as they can comply with the appropriate db levels.

Wouldn't it be nice if we in the motorcycling community could influence all riders to be reasonable about noise levels, then we wouldn't need these laws.

Peter
Well said. Personally, I hope the law passes. The noise drives me nuts.
secondcurve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 11:18 PM   #11
RI Swamp Yankee
Senior Member
 
RI Swamp Yankee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: North Kingstown RI
Posts: 688
Thanks: 143
Thanked 83 Times in 55 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodsy View Post
.... I swear the politicians could screw up replacing a lightbulb! .....
No problem, 1 to hold the bulb and a few hundred to turn the building.

Quote:
[106] 95 decibels on the decibel meter
That part is unenforceable if that is the actual text. What kind of DB meter? Is that a meter referance to 20 micropascals often referred to as "absolute" sound level? What is the weighting (designed frequency response) of the meter? Remember, 95 decibels is not a measure of loudness, unless we assume something, it is a ratio.

IMHO, badly written and dumb!
__________________
Gene ~ aka "another RI Swamp Yankee"
RI Swamp Yankee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009, 12:10 AM   #12
Channel Pirate
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Weirs Beach (full time)
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
Default

They will have bike week knocked down to 5,000 motorcycles in the next few years at this rate
Channel Pirate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009, 01:14 AM   #13
Mee-n-Mac
Senior Member
 
Mee-n-Mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,943
Thanks: 23
Thanked 111 Times in 51 Posts
Arrow dB A scale

Quote:
Originally Posted by RI Swamp Yankee View Post
What kind of DB meter? Is that a meter referance to 20 micropascals often referred to as "absolute" sound level? What is the weighting (designed frequency response) of the meter? Remember, 95 decibels is not a measure of loudness, unless we assume something, it is a ratio.

IMHO, badly written and dumb!
Para IIA above stated ...

II-a. No person shall operate in this state any motorcycle which produces a sound level in excess of [106] 95 decibels on the A scale, when measured in accordance with the provisions of the Society of Automotive Engineers Recommended Practice ANSI/SAE J-1287 annual report on “Measurement of Exhaust Sound Levels of Stationary Motorcycles".


So, like the boat SPL RSA, it's dB-A and thus 0 dB = 20 micropascals. Still requiring a "functional" tach and outlawing aftermarket exhaust is dumb. Who cares so long as the sound level is met ? I wonder if these wonderkids will do the same thing for loud cars ? So sorry Walker etal, only factory exhaust allowed in NH ! I believe other states require MC muffler manufacturers to certify their product(s) meet certain SPLs. Why can't NH do the same ?
__________________
Mee'n'Mac
"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by simple stupidity or ignorance. The latter are a lot more common than the former." - RAH
Mee-n-Mac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2009, 01:08 AM   #14
RI Swamp Yankee
Senior Member
 
RI Swamp Yankee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: North Kingstown RI
Posts: 688
Thanks: 143
Thanked 83 Times in 55 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mee-n-Mac View Post
Para IIA above stated ...

II-a. No person shall operate in this state any motorcycle which produces a sound level in excess of [106] 95 decibels on the A scale, when measured in accordance with the provisions of the Society of Automotive Engineers Recommended Practice ANSI/SAE J-1287 annual report on “Measurement of Exhaust Sound Levels of Stationary Motorcycles".
...?
Thanks Mee-n-Mac, I missed that part.

On another note, most home lawnmowers would fail those requirements.
__________________
Gene ~ aka "another RI Swamp Yankee"
RI Swamp Yankee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2009, 03:07 PM   #15
Mee-n-Mac
Senior Member
 
Mee-n-Mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,943
Thanks: 23
Thanked 111 Times in 51 Posts
Talking What's next

Quote:
Originally Posted by RI Swamp Yankee View Post
On another note, most home lawnmowers would fail those requirements.
Ssshhhhh... let's not give the "wonderkids" any more to think about !
__________________
Mee'n'Mac
"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by simple stupidity or ignorance. The latter are a lot more common than the former." - RAH
Mee-n-Mac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2009, 03:21 PM   #16
SIKSUKR
Senior Member
 
SIKSUKR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
Default Wmur

Saw this article on WMUR's website:

Bikers Revved Up Over Pipe-Muffling Bill
POSTED: 10:32 am EST January 22, 2009


CONCORD, N.H. -- The state wants to muffle loud motorcycles, but riders said the bill will cause them hardship.

State Rep. Judith Day, of North Hampton, N.H., said she sponsored the bill after 1,000 voters in her town signed a petition asking for further limits on motorcycle noise. Current law says motorcycles can produce up to 106 decibels, but the new law would limit the noise coming from the tailpipes to 99 decibels. The fines would also increase from a maximum of $300 to $1,000.

About 120 people showed up to the bill's public hearing on Wednesday, most of them against the change. Opponents said the new limits would cost bikers and dealers money to change their motorcycle tailpipes and could hurt Laconia's annual motorcycle week, a major economic event for the Lakes Region.
__________________
SIKSUKR
SIKSUKR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2009, 05:28 PM   #17
NoBozo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Portsmouth. RI
Posts: 2,231
Thanks: 400
Thanked 460 Times in 308 Posts
Default

Every NEW motorcycle sold has to meet certain Federal sound requirements. I don't believe dealers are permitted to change out the stock mufflers at the time of sale of the NEW bike. (I could be wrong).

I've always wondered where ALL those shiny new Harley mufflers go, after the owner buys aftermarket mufflers and puts them on the bike. Maybe they are still in the garage. NoBozo
NoBozo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2009, 08:53 AM   #18
chipj29
Senior Member
 
chipj29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bow
Posts: 1,874
Thanks: 521
Thanked 308 Times in 162 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NoBozo View Post
Every NEW motorcycle sold has to meet certain Federal sound requirements. I don't believe dealers are permitted to change out the stock mufflers at the time of sale of the NEW bike. (I could be wrong).

I've always wondered where ALL those shiny new Harley mufflers go, after the owner buys aftermarket mufflers and puts them on the bike. Maybe they are still in the garage. NoBozo
That's exactly where they are, in the owners garage. Every year the stock pipe has to be reinstalled so they can get their inspection sticker. What a joke/scam that is.
__________________
Getting ready for winter!
chipj29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.35964 seconds