![]() |
![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Calendar | Register | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
In an effort not to highjack a previous thread, I am moving this disscussion. I would like input on what other parents have done for children under 12 in order to prepare them for possible accidents on the water.
Much to my kids disgruntlement, we require PFD's at all times in the water and on the dock. Rule at our cabin is that anyone who hasnt passed the lifeguard test has to have on one. Even then though, and although I am well into adulthood, my dad will chastise me if he sees me in the kyack/sailboat without one ![]() My kids have had swim lessons. But the knowledge of the lake/boating has really come more through hands on disscussions about safety where we slowly build thier store of knowledge. They have been in deep water, tube, and will learn to ski next summer....but in a true emergency, you can never be sure of someone's reactions. What steps do forum members take to educate thier young kids? Are there boating/water safety classess out there for younger children? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 33
Thanked 439 Times in 249 Posts
|
![]()
It still amazes me that so many people can't swim. I guess it's too expensive to teach kids in school, soccer is cheaper.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin, Ma / Gilford
Posts: 1,934
Thanks: 450
Thanked 605 Times in 341 Posts
|
![]()
Excellant idea to start aa new thread -- I almost did when it first came up -- so here's my original post
Quote:
__________________
A bad day on the Big Lake (although I've never had one) - Still beats a day at the office!! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,254
Thanks: 423
Thanked 366 Times in 175 Posts
|
![]()
The biggest risk we see to safety for kids on the lake is when they swim off the boat in rough water. If something happened they would be lost in an instant. We always had our kids swim off the boat wearing a life vest. They actually had fun diving off the boat and bouncing up. I am no wimp but get an awful bad feeling when I see a boat stop in the broads and 5 kids jump off. You would think the kids are in much more danger under the boat than on the boat.
As Winni is a northern lake that is pretty cold for half the time we use it, you should consider educating you kids about hypothermia. The time of year changes a water event dramatically. One's ability to get out of the water changes a lot between 70 and 40 degrees. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 233
Thanks: 14
Thanked 16 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]()
My 2 cents.
I think requiring that non-PFD wearers be lifeguard certified might be a little extreme for the dock. I think if they know how to swim, they should be alright. Motorboats, if the conditions are smooth, the gunwales are fairly high, and the kids are well-behaved, I don't see a problem with them taking off their jackets. Kayaks, I don't know. Can go either way. Sailboats (of ANY kind), PFDs MUST be worn by EVERYONE (unless below deck or well out of the way of the boom). The main reason being getting hit by the boom and knocked out of the boat/unconscious. A good exercise I use to educate kids (I teach sailing), is during the swim test, throw them a life jacket and have them try to get into it (after having them swim 75 yards and tread water for 4 minutes). It shows them how difficult it is to put one on after a fall overboard and reinforces the rule that PFDs are worn at all times in the boat.
__________________
Sail fast, live slow! |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,254
Thanks: 423
Thanked 366 Times in 175 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Center Harbor
Posts: 1,049
Thanks: 15
Thanked 472 Times in 107 Posts
|
![]()
In EMT class 13 years ago, and in every refresher I've gone to since, they have taught the following about rescuing a person in the water:
A person who feels he/she is in danger of drowning (whether they are or not) is very desperate, and therefore very dangerous to approach. He/she will not think twice about pushing the rescuer under and using the rescuer as a flotation cushion. The victim may be a total saint under normal conditions, but dire situations can bring out some very unpredictable and dangerous behavior in us all. Therefore, when you're faced with a person thrashing about in the water, remember this order: Reach - Throw - Row - Go. First try to reach for the person while secured to dry land or a stable boat. You can use a pole or paddle to extend your reach. If that doesn't work, try a throwable device, preferably with a rope attached so you can haul them in. In many cases this will be the first thing you do anyway, since victims are seldom within reach. If that doesn't work, use a boat to go get them ("Row".) This step assumes that the rescuer is on land. "Row" may be the first thing you do if you're already on the water. Upon arriving near the victim you would go through steps 1 & 2 (reach-throw) ONLY IF your craft is stable enough to support someone hanging off the side. If you're in a canoe or a small rowboat, the desperate victim may well capsize it while trying to get in (against your wishes.) If you're not in a sturdy craft, DON'T get too close to the victim. Skip step 1 and just "throw." Then you can tow them to safety - just don't let the desperate person get near your unstable craft. Finally, if all else fails, and only if all else fails, GO. This means swim. Only do this if you know how to rescue a person from the water and if you're fully prepared to prevent the victim from pushing you under. Here is something that stunned us all when we learned it in EMT class, but it makes sense: It is actually OK to wait for the victim to go unconscious IF 1) the victim is hysterical - obviously desperate AND 2) Swimming to the victim is your only rescue option AND 3) You are not prepared or are physically unable to subdue and restrain the victim while simultaneously rescuing him/her. In such a case, it is a matter of scene safety - the first priority in any rescue scene. If the scene is not safe, an unprepared rescuer is more likely to make the scene worse by becoming an additional victim. When you have to rescue by swimming, waiting for the hysterical person in water to go unconscious is the only way to ensure scene safety. The unconscious person may then be pulled to safety without endangering the swimmer who's doing the pulling. Once ashore/aboard, go through the rescue breathing routine - open the airway and check for breathing, and provide it if there is none. The victim may need to be treated for choking (belly thrusts) and sometimes they start breathing spontanously after the water is cleared from the airway. Other times, rescue breathing is what's needed to re-stimulate spontaneous breath. Get the ambulance rolling your way if it's not already. In both cases, the previously-unconscious victim should get to a hospital to get checked out - even if he/she feels fine. There may be water in the lungs that could lead to infection, and other complications from the near-drowning may become problems later if they're not treated early. That brings up a final point - Everyone should learn CPR. Even kids can learn it and they have saved lives with it. Last edited by CanisLupusArctos; 09-19-2007 at 01:51 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|