Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > Home, Cottage or Land Maintenance
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQDonate Members List Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-05-2011, 08:35 PM   #1
Slickcraft
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Welch Island and The Taylor Community
Posts: 3,317
Thanks: 1,232
Thanked 2,103 Times in 960 Posts
Default

Over the past two years we have changed over all our bulbs to CFL at home and here at camp. Today's CFL bulbs are a big improvement over a few years ago and use 1/4 the energy of incandescent for the same light output.

Of course if you want 90% of the electricity to generate heat, say to keep the chicken coop warm in the winter or to operate one of those old kids toy ovens, than incandescent is the way to go.
Slickcraft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2011, 09:15 PM   #2
SteveA
Deceased Member
 
SteveA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gilford, NH
Posts: 2,311
Thanks: 1,070
Thanked 2,054 Times in 497 Posts
Default We switched over almost a year ago.

The lights are fine, and my electric bill is down. Like Dan, I haven't figured out the "pay back" for the more expensive bulbs, but if they last the way they advertise, it's a better deal all around.

I even went with the "dimable" ones for our pocket lights and in the kitchen. And the ice cream doesn't melt under the higher heat incandescent bulbs. Took a little getting use to, but they produce a very pleasant light with almost no heat output.

I'm sold... and like I said, the electric bill is down.


Sorry, couldn't resist the "Go Green" font color!
__________________
"Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry he'll be a mile away and barefoot!" unknown
SteveA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2011, 10:57 PM   #3
Belkin
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 33
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default CFL Alternative

CFLs do have their drawbacks. Their long life is affected by the number of on-off cycles. I have only one light that stays on for any length of time. The rest of the lights go on and off as I enter and leave rooms; which is frequent. I find that under those conditions the life of CFLs are reduced considerably.

I think, for the long term, LEDs will be the solution. While they are still an expensive alternative, they do have a much longer life (upwards of 100,000 hours), turn on instantly and are even more efficient than CFLs. The fact that they have made their way into our TVs indicates that the price is coming down and that there is good color control.
Belkin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Belkin For This Useful Post:
DRH (09-09-2011), SteveA (09-06-2011)
Old 09-06-2011, 06:58 AM   #4
chipj29
Senior Member
 
chipj29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bow
Posts: 1,874
Thanks: 521
Thanked 308 Times in 162 Posts
Default

One thing I would not suggest, is outdoor CFL floodlights. In the winter they take forever to warm up and give of a respectable amount of light. Honestly I wish I had not made the switch to the CFL floodlights. They were expensive, and now I am stuck with them because I don't want to throw them out.
__________________
Getting ready for winter!
chipj29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.16313 seconds