Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-31-2008, 04:24 PM   #15
brk-lnt
Senior Member
 
brk-lnt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South Down Shores
Posts: 1,944
Thanks: 545
Thanked 570 Times in 335 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by This'nThat View Post
So, you shouldn't be telling me I am whining. I'm pointing out that there is no competition -- thus, there is no competitive constraint on prices. Who's at fault here? I don't care (but you seem to want to point the finger at others -- that's fine, but it doesn't change the fact that there's no competition). I am very much based in reality, and I will complain. BTW, complaining about a price increase is not stomping my feet. Where do you come up with these outrageous comparisons?
Most towns welcome a competitive cable company, but the financial logistics make it unprofitable for more than one operator to exist in areas where there is not a lot of subscriber density.

If Comcast came in, they would both have to charge about 40% above the current rates to cover the cost of the cable plant spread over a smaller overall subscriber base.

And again, you have no clue how the prices are actually set and how little control the cable companies truly have over their prices.
__________________
[insert witty phrase here]
brk-lnt is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 2.66192 seconds