Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-31-2008, 04:42 PM   #16
This'nThat
Senior Member
 
This'nThat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 534
Thanks: 19
Thanked 134 Times in 61 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brk-lnt View Post
... but the financial logistics make it unprofitable for more than one operator to exist ... If Comcast came in, they would both have to charge about 40% above the current rates ...And again, you have no clue how the prices are actually set and how little control the cable companies truly have over their prices.
So, in an era of deflation, massive job loses, declining property values, plunging commodity prices, and a recession -- Metrocast is justified in raising its prices by 6% and I should just shut up and be happy about it -- because I don't have a clue? Ain't gonna happen, because in spite of all of Metrocast's not-yet-explained excuses, and in defiance of your superior (but not very specifically-stated) knowledge of cable-company finances, their rate increase isn't justifiable. And, instead of "supposing" a 40% increase in rates if Comcast came in too (where did you get that unsuported number?), let's just try it and see. I want options. I don't want to keep my mouth shut and let "Big Cable" dictate my options.
This'nThat is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 2.83260 seconds